Itinerant Londoner

Choosing the right backpack

January 16, 2009 · 12 Comments

Travelling solo for a year means there will be very few constants in my life. The most important of which will be my backpack. Choose the right one and it will make my journey easier…choose the wrong one and I’ll be cursing it for being like a ball and chain that I can’t escape from.

I thought finding my perfect travelling companion would be easy, I figured it was largely a matter of deciding what size I wanted and then just choosing one. How wrong I was. What I thought would be a quick decision has taken ages…so I thought I’d share what I’ve learnt along the way, just in case you’re thinking of doing something similar.

I learnt one key thing during my trip to Laos (the dry run for my big trip) – the most important thing for me was to get a pack that opens from the front than from the top. My toploading rucksack drove me mad – while there was supposedly some access from the front, it was pretty useless, and it felt like I spent about half the trip packing & re-packing to get to stuff at the bottom of the bag. My friend Chris, who I was travelling with, had one that opened all the way round like a suitcase when laid flat, giving access to the whole bag. This was my first experience of pack-envy.

Rule one: get one that loads from the front

The second thing I learnt was to check the bag is properly lockable. While it was possible to loop a padlock through the two main zips, there was still a gap between them that could easily be opened up for people to root around in, which is not ideal when your bag is going to be accessible by other people on buses, in hostels, and when being checked in for flights. Not being lockable may be OK for people on hiking trips, but it’s not acceptable for a long trip like mine.

Rule two: make sure it’s lockable

With my Lao experience in mind, I started looking for packs, and quickly discovered that the vast majority of rucksacks on sale are really designed for hikers rather than travellers – and in fact what I was looking for (particularly with my obsession with getting a front loader) was not a “rucksack” but a “travel pack”

Rule three: look for the words “travel pack”

Searching online quickly taught me one thing about travel packs: they nearly all come with a detachable daypack. “How useful!” I thought, and quickly narrowed my search down further to these. It wasn’t until I went into a shop to try one on (my early favourites, the Osprey Waypoint 60 and the North Face Backtrack), that I realised that perhaps this wasn’t the best idea – the Waypoint’s daypack is badly designed and miniscule; the North Face one really poorly attached to the main pack. Further reading online suggested that having the detachable pack attached moves the centre of gravity backwards, making your more unstable on your feet, with the solution being to wear it on your front for better balance. I figured if the daypacks were poorly designed and not ideal for wearing attached anyway, I may as well buy a proper daypack separately. Oh, and most importantly they all look really ugly. And who wants to be stuck with an ugly backpack for a year and face the mockery of your fellow travellers?

Rule four: avoid the ones with a detachable daypack

The trickiest decision is what size to go for. On previous backpacking trips to Laos & Guatemala I reckon most travellers look like they have 80L or more packs; meanwhile hardened travellers in places like the Thorn Tree and the BootsnAll forums seem to compete to see who can travel with the smallest pack, with 40L or less being advocated. I travelled Guatemala with 40 and Laos with 60, and I found the Lao experience better, despite the extra weight, as I felt like there was nothing I was missing. I’ll do a dummy packing run with my existing (but evil top-loading) pack just to check I can get everything I plan to take into a pack that size, before I make my final purchase

Rule five: Too small and you’ll have to leave stuff out. Too big and you’ll do your back in. 60-65 litres (that’s 3,500-4,000 cubic inches for my American visitors) feels about right, although a more sensible packer than me could get away with 50 quite easily

This last two requirements really narrowed my choice down further – essentially to just two:The Lowe Alpine Travel Trekker ND60 & the Osprey Porter 65
                   
Making a decision

One final factor came into play in terms of deciding which to go for: I want to be able to try the pack on to see how comfortable it is – after all, it will be on my back weighing me down for the next 12 months. I’ve been unable to find a stockist for the Porter in London (and anyway, it’s the uglier of the two), so my current favourite is the Lowe Alpine.

It ticks all the above boxes, but as well it has the following features that are helping convince me:
- Adjustable back means it can be fitted to suit my size, making it more comfortable
- Its own raincover which tucks away
- The main straps zip away into a compartment at the back, making it look more like a suitcase and meaning there is less dangling to get caught up in baggage reclaim systems
- Well padded hip-belt
- Various internal pockets for better organisation
- It also has better padded straps and back support than most travel packs, making this closer to a hiking backpack, and therefore hopefully more comfortable to wear for longer periods.

Now the eagle-eyed among you may spot that this is technically a women’s pack (the male equivalent is the Travel Trekker 70L – but that is bigger than I want and is a less comfortable fit for me, especially as I’m a bit of a hobbit) but I’ve been assured that there is very little design-wise that makes them different other than slightly narrower straps.

I’m planning to buy in the next week or so – unless any more experienced travellers can point me to anything obvious I’ve missed?

Hopefully that’ll be useful for anyone planning a similar purchase – of course this is a purely personal view that you may disagree with, here are some links to other articles that I found helpful, even if I didn’t come to the same conclusions:

The ever helpful Nomadic Matt gives his guide to choosing the right pack, including links to various brands
Brave New Traveller has an interesting article on one man’s obsessive hunt for the perfect backpack
Australian site bakpakka goes into quite a lot of detail on types of pack including useful stiff on the right materials and zips
Gapyear.com has some useful stuff on the kind of features to look out for.
Cotswold Outdoor have some useful tips on how to pack

UPDATEI have now bought my backpack. After an hour or so trying the two bags on, having them properly fitted by the everso helpful staff at Ellis Brigham in Covent Garden, and filled with weight to simulate what it would be like with a full load, it turned out that the Lowe Alpine back was also the most comfortable, so I’ve gone with that.

Categories: Planning
Tagged: , , ,

12 responses so far ↓

  • Cuckoo // January 16, 2009 at 3:11 pm | Reply

    Oh, I was about to write on this topic. I couldn’t get what I wanted and ended up buying a top loaded one. But that’s not the last backpack I am going to use. :-)

    You have mentioned everything I could think of. Happy buying !!

  • Heatheronhertravels // January 18, 2009 at 8:43 pm | Reply

    Hi Geoff

    Thanks for adding me to your Blogroll – I wonder if you could change the link so it points to my new Travel Site at

    http://heatheronhertravels.com/

    Many Thanks
    Heather

  • Gillian // January 21, 2009 at 3:54 pm | Reply

    Thanks for the rundown Geoff. We haven’t bought our packs yet either although we have certainly checked lots out. I was leaning towards a toploader (thinking better security?) but, given your advice here, I will check out the front loaders too!

  • Geoff // January 21, 2009 at 4:56 pm | Reply

    From what I’ve looked at, the frontloaders are generally more, not less secure, as they have better quality zips and are more likely to be securely lockable, as they are designed to be checked into flights, so security is a high priority.

  • Nath // January 21, 2009 at 5:45 pm | Reply

    Great advice, Geoff. As we’ve said before, these front loaders are improving all the time.

    There are several on the market now that I would consider using as a long term travel pack.

  • Anna // January 21, 2009 at 9:59 pm | Reply

    Hey – front loaders are definitely the way to go. Top loaders will drive you mental when trying to find something specific. And 60-65 L is about right. I (a 120 lb girl) had a huge male 85L for my trip last year and I pretty much killed myself. I have a 65L now and it is just perfect.

  • Catherine // January 24, 2009 at 11:24 pm | Reply

    Good luck with all your final preparations…and if there is anything I can let you know about Mexico City…

  • Carrie // January 25, 2009 at 4:36 am | Reply

    Hi Geoff,
    Finding the right travel pack is hard, and I’m totally with you on the weight issue. We tend to travel for 3-4 months at a time. We both carry 60L backpacks which usually weigh in around the 50L mark.

    I spent a lot of money on my pack in 2002, and it’s still kicking. I almost hate to retire it. It’s been all over South East Asia. It has all the features you mentioned above.

    The one thing I’ve learned, especially while traveling in Asia, is that a lockable bag won’t stop someone if they want to get into your belongings. A friend of ours had his pack cut open with a razor blade. They went right around his lock. Since then, John and I have always locked our bags and we keep them in their rain covers at all times. We figure going through twice as much material might be a pain in the butt for others.

    Good luck with your travels and thanks for stopping by the other day. I’m looking forward to reading about your next adventure!

  • Nomadic Matt // January 25, 2009 at 5:37 am | Reply

    Thank you for the link love and I hope my guide helped you in your pick!

  • Christie // February 14, 2009 at 4:06 am | Reply

    This is really helpful! Thanks for putting this together.

  • Craig | travelvice.com // February 23, 2009 at 1:19 pm | Reply

    Thanks for cluing me into the Lowe Alpine’s — Tatiana’s in the market for a new pack, and I’m researching for her.

    Perhaps this fellow will be added to the list, for her gear + baby Aidric’s:
    http://www.ebags.com/lowe_alpine/tt_tour_70/product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=123135

  • Jeremy Rees // March 22, 2009 at 5:40 am | Reply

    Geoff, great rundown. We both initially thought big when it came to the backpacks. I must have tried on 20 bags! I finally chose the NorthFace Primero 70L because of the top, bottom and side load access, comfortable back, shoulder and hipbelt, and high level of water-resistance. My wife found an Osprey Ariel 65L which was a perfect fit for her, with an ingenious two-part hipbelt, and good torso-length.

    We read about people having to pay for extra seats on trains and buses because of huge bags, and after a test pack we found her Ariel was only about 75% full. I also looked into downsizing, but the Primero is 29″ tall, and anything 50L or bigger is still 28-30,” so loosing all the things I love about the Primero wasn’t worth it.

    My wife’s new/now backpack is the Deuter Futura Pro 42L. She hestitated quite a bit about the small size, but it has a incredible back area that lets in tons of air, and very clever compact shape. In fact, Deuter bags kind of came out of left field for us and we’re both very impressed. Extensive attention to detail and nice unique features like integrated rain covers really make the brand stand out.

    In terms of bigger front-loaders, my wife actually considered Deuter’s 55L travel bag which loads in the front and has a detachable 10L daypack. We thought the Deuter travel bag was neat because it didn’t compromise in having a lousy hipbelt and didn’t have bulky uncomfortable wheels. Overall, however, it weighed quite a bit more than her 42L.

Leave a Comment